The President of Panama said he would go to Spain and Italy to pressure companies to honour contracts to expand his country’s canal after a building consortium behind the project threatened to suspend work because of a row over costs.
The consortium – Spain’s Sacyr, Italy’s Salini Impregilo, Belgium’s Jan De Nul and Panama’s Constructora Urbana – said on Wednesday that $1.6 billion in cost overruns on the $3.2 billion plan to build a third set of locks for the canal should be met by Panama.
The consortium, known as Grupo Unidos por el Canal, said the Panama Canal Authority (PCA) had 21 days to respond to its demands during which work would continue, but the project would be suspended if that requirement was not met.
Just a few hours later, the PCA rejected the demand, hinting it could find others to complete the job. Shares in Sacyr, which heads the consortium, slumped nine per cent on Thursday.
Panamanian President Ricardo Martinelli accused the companies of “great irresponsibility” and said they had endangered the massive construction project, which has been a major driver of the Central American nation’s economy.
Martinelli, who took power in 2009, said he expected Italy and Spain to uphold commitments to back the project which the countries’ leaders made to him during his first year in office.
“So I’m going to go to Spain and Italy to demand this from them, because a company should not be able to put such a high amount of overrun costs on a project that belongs to humanity,” he told reporters in Panama City.
The Spanish and Italian governments have a “moral responsibility” to help resolve the dispute because their companies were engaged in the construction, Martinelli said.
Jorge Quijano, the head of the PCA, said if the project were delayed due to the dispute, Panama would see it through: “This work will be finished, never fear, even if it takes longer to complete.”
Panama has already moved back the scheduled completion date for the expansion from October 2014 into mid-2015.
To see that the work was concluded, Quijano said the PCA had since November been in contact with insurer Zurich in North America, with which it had $600 million in surety bonds that could be used to support the project.
In addition, the PCA could tap the $1.2 billion it had not yet paid to the consortium to finish the work, he added. So far the PCA had only paid the contractors $2 billion, he said.
The new locks represent the biggest chunk of the canal expansion plan, which overall is worth some $5.3 billion.
The PCA says the total expansion is just over 70 per cent finished with the locks 65 per cent complete. The canal’s extension aims to broaden and deepen existing channels so that more and bigger vessels can sail through. The consortium said the overruns were due to unforeseen eventsduring construction, which it said was “normal” in such projects. It also said the PCA had failed in its obligations and given the consortium “inexact” information for the project.
But the PCA said that if the consortium was not capable of honouring its agreements, it would initiate “mechanisms from the contract that would allow the work to be completed.”
It did not explain what those would be.
Sacyr won the bid on the canal contract in 2009 with a $3.12 billion offer, which was considerably lower than that of rivals, as well as below the $3.48 billion reference set by the PCA.
Political columnist Pepe Oneto, writing in opinion blog republica.com, said the news was terrible for Spain’s attempt to rebuild its image abroad following a severe economic crisis with the collapse of the country’s building and property sector.
“The Spanish government... knew that it was impossible for the budget to be met. Sacyr bid low, convinced that, in the end, the cost overruns it is demanding now would be met,” he said.
A spokesman for Sacyr said that part of the cost overrun was because some building materials as originally budgeted were not adequate for the final work. The PCA had rejected the concrete mix the consortium had planned to use for the project.
“The consortium’s intention is also to find a solution within the terms of the contract, as there are mechanisms that make it possible,” Sacyr’s spokesman said, without elaborating.
The company’s debts at the end of September were three times its market capitalisation. Analysts at the brokerage of Banco Sabadell said the news was not good for Sacyr or its image, but played down the impact on the builder’s results.
Newspaper El País reported in 2009 that Panama’s foreign minister, Juan Carlos Varela, had predicted the project would fail because the builders were in financial trouble.
*See OnboardOnline's analysis of the Panama Canal Project here
*For more news coverage of the latest developments click here
*Images courtesy of the Panama Canal Authority
*Original story: Times of Malta via Google News (search term: Panama Canal in Crisis)